Видео

@veevinnie8321 0 seconds ago In my view it's all imagination and speculation. The reality is that no one seems to really KNOW about any of this stuiff. The brain/mind is probably not equipped to KNOW about these speculative claimed.

Unsolved Math Victories of the Cenozoic Era, which is also known as the "age of mammals" by Taha M. Muhammad/ USA Kurd Iraq ruclips.net/video/M5UuHlHps8E/видео.html Fermat’s Last Theorem /Approved by Cambridge University UK, By Taha M. Muhammad/ USA Kurd Iraq ruclips.net/video/ikSz36RDkSY/видео.html Collatz Sequence/ Approved by Cambridge University UK By Taha M. Muhammad/ USA Kurd Iraq ruclips.net/video/pX5Sih8dsts/видео.html /Euler Perfect Box/ Approved by Cambridge University UK By Taha M. Muhammad/ USA Kurd Iraq

He is cute! in the sense where you can see his love and interest in mathematics. you can feel his passion for it, trying to put those feelings into words. Wows~! To all my students: Tenacity in face of solving the equation. Hang in there children!

sure sure

What a lovely & inspirational man. His answers spark something inside my body and mind I'm not able to put into words rn

AI is doing ur math tutor and it's removing call center and 300m jobs and so we have new areas of work not me❤❤🎉🎉

What about fractal analogies of geophysics instabilities in Fowlers PREM chart to quantum mechanics?? ... and spinors??

Ik- There is ONE(Ik) reality, the origin and the source of everything. The creation did not come out of nothing. When there was nothing, there was ONE, Ik. Onkaar- When Ik becomes the creative principal it becomes Onkaar. Onkaar manifests as visible and invisible phenomenon. The creative principle is not separated from the created, it is present throughout the creation in an unbroken form, 'kaar'. Satnaam- The sustaining principle of Ik is Satnaam, the True Name - EXISTENCE Kartaa Purakh- Ik Onkaar is Creator and Doer (Kartaa) of everything, all the seen and unseen phenomenon. It is not just a law or a system, it is a Purakh, a Person. If I am sentient then so to is The Totality Nirbhau- That Ik Onkaar is devoid of any fear, because there is nothing but itself. Nirvair- That Ik Onkaar is devoid of any enmity because there is nothing but itself. Akaal Moorat- That Ik Onkaar is beyond Time (Akaal) and yet it is existing. Its a Form(Moorat) which does not exist in Time. Ajooni- That Ik Onkaar does not condense and come into any birth. All the phenomenon of birth and death of forms are within it. Saibhang- That Ik Onkaar exists on its own, by its own. It is not caused by anything before it or beyond it. Gurprasaad- That Ik Onkaar expresses itself through a channel known as Guru and it is only its own Grace and Mercy (Prasaad) that this happens. Ik­oaʼnkār saṯ nām karṯā purakẖ nirbẖa­o nirvair akāl mūraṯ ajūnī saibẖaʼn gur parsāḏ. One Universal Creator. The Name Is Existence. Creative Being Personified. No Fear. No Hatred. Image Of The Undying, Beyond Birth, Self-Existent. By Guru's Grace

A dear, sweet, mathematician. God’s gift to mankind,

I hope you honor see my notes, would you please communicate with me because I solved both Fermat's Last Theorems! Please it will be nice of you to take care of my solutions of Fermat. Euler, and Collatz Sequence.

Godel expresses wff's in odd numbers every number is prime relative to its own base n = n(n/n)=n(1_n) (primes do not include division by other numbers) Goldbach's Conjecture "every even number is the sum of two primes" n + n = 2n Godel's expression does not include even numbers in his defintion of wff's - they are therefore "undecidable" (o + e) = o is always odd so is undecidable because of the existence of even numbers (e+e) = e (o and e are sets of numbers). Proof of Fermat"s Theorem for Village Idiots c = a + b c^n = [a^n + b^n] + f(a,b,n) (Binomial Expansion) c^n = a^n + b^n iff f(a,b,n) = 0 f(a,b,n) <> 0 c^n <> a^n + b^n QED works also for n = 2. Someone go tell the physicists (Especially Einstein and Pauli) and also for multinomials (tell the cosmetologists..) (Hint: Wiles had to use modular functions, which are only defined on the positive half of the complex plane.) there are no negative numbers: -c= a-b, b>a iff b-c=a, a >0, a-a = 0, a=a if there are no negative numbers, there are no square roots of negative numbers. The ""complex" plane is affine to the real plane (1^2 <> 1, sqr(1^2) = 1 <> 2qr(1) (Russsell's Paradox; a number can't both multiply and not multiply itself). more on this on the physicsdiscussionforum (dot org)

To answer that man's retort, no, it is not a necessary illusion to believe that mathematics is discovered. Mathematics is discovered, the discovery is not an illusion, and we know this because but we are aware of the fact that that the mathematical facts we study are grounded in abstract objects. These abstract objects and their properties and relationships are understood to exist a priori -- that is, they exist whether we are aware of them or not: for example, 2+2 is 4 whether we recognized it or not. By recognizing it, and by proving it, we haven't invented the relationship 2+2=4 -- we've merely discovered it. We discovered a relationship between two a priori objects. By this token, you can understand that mathematicians don't invent mathematical facts: they find them.

Hello Professor Jay Daigle, I am looking forward to meeting you online 4/26/2024 about my presentation of Collatz Sequence. Taha M. Muhammad/ USA Kurd Iraq Owner of Collatz, Euler, and Fermat's both last Theories

The comments must be fun

Professor Wiles, who wisely departed from the toxic realm that claimed the best two mathematicians of the British Empire (Turing and Ramanujan), practices MATHEMATICS, not that french-originated abomination "maths"

Just found out that she played Cornet in a Brass Band, yesss I understand that more than all those complicated number things

Iron man is more believable. These experts are on a trip ..

There's a prize, you work for the money that's advertised, so then you can move on to the next one and also have enough to eat and afford rent. No? 1 million doesn't buy a home.

129 pages solution is not ok for a^n +b^n = c^n! Who did review your solution? My solution is on 3 pages and AMM, EMS, AMS, and LMS all are refusing to look at my solution because of a discrimination. I solved Collatz Sequence, Euler Perfect Box, and many, but because I am unknown and refugee then my solution all hided by those who have authorities in USA, UK, and Germany to tell ok!

I think the best analogy is an amusement park ride such as the Haunted Mansion ride at Disneyworld. You get on at the beginning, you are pulled through, everything that you’re going to see is the future and it has all been prepared for you in advance. Where you are is the present and the part you’ve already seen is the past and it is still there.

I love this man

Hey sir, I just watched your video and I must say that it was really informative and well-made. I was wondering if I could help you edit your videos and also highly engaging thumbnails which will help your video to reach to a wider audience.

The clock moves, the idea of feeling time is moving means nothing to me. The Now is always where I am. I suspect that time is not something science can understand, time is acturally outside. Even when we find spoiled food in the fridge, it isn't about time. Time didn't do it neglect did it can't measure that either.

I am Taha M. Muhammad Solved Collatz Sequence in 3 Ways Euler Perfect Box Fermat’s Last and General Solutions On January 23, 2024 I put all above at RUclips & Twitter

I think.. people are full of shit..🤣

Good

Not just a block, a chain of block's. Possibly within time/energy.

Entropy would have no planets if everything was moving away from everything else.

1:05-3:03 is quite an important message... it's not often to hear admittance from a professional that new math will always be difficult, and that a differentiator between them and a student is the ability to deal with the uncomfortable struggle

Inspiration

What's the website y'all mentioned at the end?

I'm so grateful 🙏. Thank you ⬛️

Omfg 😂😂😂😂😂 you are CRAZY 🎉

😊

Only the greats say things like this. I heard Richard Feynman say something very similar. I suspect it's just not true. Things always look doable for everybody to those who are able to do those things. It looks like a sort of winners bias.

There is no such word as maths. The shortening of the word mathematics is math.

I would like to think that he was not humbling himself down when he said that all of us (he meant mathematicians) are experiencing the same struggle of the third grader but at a much bigger scale. That is sweet, and the man proved to be sweet as usual. But my critical faculties refuse to submit. I know some people who would not produce useful output in mathematics even if they persisted in this struggle for decades. I mean anything useful, let alone solving a centuries-old stubborn problem.

time is not a f'n dimension. its a metric used to make measurements of change ffs.

Richard Feynman said, "most of the time you feel stupid" because you can't get the answer.

wheres my scottish hispanic milf

Юрий Асафьевич, спасибо Вам за рассказ. На сайте института гидромеханики я прочитал, что 9 сентября 2023 года институт подвергся атаке дронов. Хотелось бы надеяться, что это критически не скажется на работе института. Во всяком случае желаю Вам и коллективу всего самого наилучшего. Я также смотрел Ваши лекции в Институте Исаака Ньютона, большое спасибо, было очень интересно.

I really appreciate your work❤

If it is the observation that changes the outcome then the Earth becomes a very special place. It is the only place known to have observers (life). No place else in the known universe is observation taking place.

I think the ensemble interpretation Einstein and others argued for should get a bit more attention. Pilot wave theory is sort of a subset of ensemble theory, but ensemble theory is more broad in that it does see there are definite values but does not necessarily state how they evolve, or even if they change deterministically or nondeterministically. It is less of a theory and more of just an interpretation since it leaves the question open, and so it's still compatible with quantum field theory unlike pilot wave theory.

Look to GOD for guidence

Yes

U see Mr.Wiles u have an encounter not with encounter but with your brain I placed that in everybody

I'm Clementina

Hi